Use this url to cite publication: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12512/110501
Options
Minimaly invasive gastric cancer surgery: a literature review / Gustas Sasnauskas, Augustinas Baušys
Type of publication
Recenzuojamos išplėstinės tezės / Peer-reviewed extended theses (T1d)
Author(s)
Title
Minimaly invasive gastric cancer surgery: a literature review / Gustas Sasnauskas, Augustinas Baušys
Publisher (trusted)
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences |
Date Issued
Date Issued |
---|
2021-04-29 |
Extent
p. 211-213.
Is part of
IHS [International Health Sciences] Conference : abstract book [29-30 April] 2021 / Students' Scientific Society of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences ; [Edited by Gabrielė Jakuškaitė]. Kaunas : Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 2021.
Version
Originalus / Original
Description
Poster session
Abstracts’ reviewers: p. 6 (143)
Bibliogr.: p. 212-213
Field of Science
Abstract
Introduction Gastric cancer remains one of the most common cancers worldwide [1]. Surgical treatment is the only potentially curative treatment option for it. Historically open gastrectomy was considered as the gold standard approach. However, in the last two decades, the development of minimally invasive surgery has led to large scale clinical trials being carried out in Asia, and later in the Western world. These trials have shown promising results. Aim To evaluate the results of clinical trials comparing short-term and long-term outcomes between minimally invasive gastric cancer surgery (MIGCS) and open gastric cancer surgery (OGCS). Methods Articles comparing minimally invasive gastric cancer treatment to open surgical treatment were found using MeSH terms in PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science research tools: “minimally invasive surgery”, “gastric cancer”, “clinical trial”. The following aspects have been evaluated in the studies: short-term outcomes of the treatment (operation time, lymph node yield, post-operative morbidity), and long-term outcomes (disease-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival). Results Overall, 16 randomized clinical trials, which evaluated short-term, long-term, or both outcomes, have been analyzed. Reviewed articles were published in the 2013-2021 period. 10 studies compared postoperative morbidity between MIGCS and OGCS groups. 6 trials with overall 3458 patients found no difference in post-operative morbidity between MIGCS and OGCS groups [2–7], and 4 trials with overall 2725 patients discovered lower morbidity in the MIGCS group [8–11]. Lymph node yield, which was compared in 4 studies with overall 2159 patients, did not differ between the MIGCS and OGCS groups [2,8,12,13]. 4 studies with overall 1695 patients evaluated operation time between the two groups, which was significantly longer in the MIGCS group [2,5,6,14]. Long-term[...].
Type of document
type::text::conference output::conference proceedings::conference paper
Other Identifier(s)
(LSMU ALMA)990001036200107106
Coverage Spatial
Lietuva / Lithuania (LT)
Language
Anglų / English (en)
Bibliographic Details
17